The disparity of interpretation of the Fair an Equitable Treatment Standard in investor-state arbitration and the subsequent lack of uniformity in the criteria used for attributing compensation for its beaches call for the need to clarify its scope and components. It is true that international investment law is a highly fragmented field lacking a multilateral treaty source. It is also true that the proliferation of international arbitration tribunals and Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs) conveys there is no single applicable law, no binding case law or stare decisis, no uniformity in the composition of the tribunals, and no overarching institutional guidance. Yet, despite this undeniable fragmentation, international investment law can rely upon general principles of law, general international law, international economic law and customary international law to help clarifying the obligations the FET standard imposes upon states and the subsequent rights it grants to investors. This article undertakes the task of setting a framework for the interpretation and application of the FET standard that helps improving legal certainty in the field of international investment arbitration. Based on the study of 55 decisions of the ICSID and a purposive interpretation of international investment law, I argue that the FET standard ought to be interpreted within a Rule of Law framework. This should allow for better clarity about the obligations and rights it conveys, without curtailing its significance in judicial reasoning as a notion à contenue variable.
Accueil >
The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard and the Need for Legal Certainty in Investor-State Arbitration : An analysis of the Jurisprudence of the ICSID
Publications récentes
-
Note sous l’arrêt du 7 février 2023 de la 4ème chambre de la cour…
Dans le dernier numéro du Journal des tribunaux, Charly Derave, Anne-Catherine Rasson et Isabelle Rorive commentent l’arrêt du 7 février… -
Recension de l’ouvrage « Les droits humains en temps de pandémie – Perspectives internationales, européennes…
Dans le n°6.979 du Journal des tribunaux du 20 avril 2024, Charly Derave a effectué une recension de l’ouvrage collectif… -
Taking Technical Standardization of Fundamental Rights Seriously for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence
Gregory Lewkowicz et Ritha Sarf publient dans la revue des juristes de sciences po un article sur la normalisation technique… -
La réforme du paysage judiciaire polonais : dixième condamnation de la Cour européenne des droits…
Dans un article publié sur le site internet de Justice-En-Ligne le 15 février dernier, Charly Derave revient sur la jurisprudence…