This paper uses the theoretical framework based on the political notions of recognition and misrecognition in order to analyze the reception of Muslim talaq divorces in French courts. It provides a critical examination of the Cour de cassation’s decision in which the Court ruled that the foreign decision acknowledging talaq divorce is contrary to public policy, and more specifically to the gender equality principle. The paper argues that PIL practices constitute instances of political misrecognition since they fail to account for complex hybrid identities. It claims that political misrecognition is illustrated by the incorporation within law of essentialized, that is narrow and demeaning representations of Muslim legal culture and Muslim women’s identities, and by the enforcement of ethnocentric methodology, which denotes the application of domestic family law choices in the transnational realm.
Accueil >
Political Recognition and Transnational Law : Gender Equality and Cultural Diversification in French Courts
Publications récentes
-
Titre VII – Revue du Conseil Constitutionnel Français
Benoit Frydman publie son étude « Interprétation et numérisation » dans la revue Titre VII. Il y analyse les enjeux… -
The European Semester as a Governance Mechanism for Rule of Law Risks in the…
Fromont L, Van Waeyenberge A. The European Semester as a Governance Mechanism for Rule of Law Risks in the EU. European… -
Violences sexuelles et sexistes devant la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme
Isabelle Rorive a contribué au troisième numéro d’Intersections. Revue semestrielle Genre& Droit. Elle a participé à la chronique « Discriminations,… -
Un Code bruxellois du logement plus adapté aux personnes en situation de vulnérabilité : retour…
Novembre 2025 Prof. Isabelle Rorive et Zoé Vandenberg, Equality Law Clinic, Centre Perelman, Faculté de Droit et de Criminologie de l’Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB). Ce…