The ‘burqa bans’ adopted in Belgium and France and contemplated elsewhere in Europe, have mobilized human rights activists and scholars, who are nearly unanimous in accusing governments and public authorities banning face veiling of violations of religious freedom and discrimination on grounds of religion as well as gender. Yet like the governments banning the face veil, the human rights activists did not have much information at their disposal concerning the experiences of women wearing it. In this paper, the human rights debate about the face veil is revisited, taking into account the insider perspectives of those women.
Accueil >
Insider Perspectives and the Human Rights Debate on Face Veil Bans
Publications récentes
-
Exploring the boundaries of AI regulatory sandboxes under the AI Act: Flexibility and real-world…
Nathan Genicot has published with Thiago Guimaraes Moraes an article in Cambridge Forum on AI: Law and Governance entitled « Exploring… -
Ce que réguler veut dire
La régulation est omniprésente dans le discours économique contemporain. Elle est perçue comme une réponse aux crises des marchés et… -
Usages, fonctions, finalités du droit
Il y a maintenant presque dix ans paraissait un ouvrage majeur de François Ost : À quoi sert le droit… -
Titre VII – Revue du Conseil Constitutionnel Français
Benoit Frydman publie son étude « Interprétation et numérisation » dans la revue Titre VII. Il y analyse les enjeux…