The ‘burqa bans’ adopted in Belgium and France and contemplated elsewhere in Europe, have mobilized human rights activists and scholars, who are nearly unanimous in accusing governments and public authorities banning face veiling of violations of religious freedom and discrimination on grounds of religion as well as gender. Yet like the governments banning the face veil, the human rights activists did not have much information at their disposal concerning the experiences of women wearing it. In this paper, the human rights debate about the face veil is revisited, taking into account the insider perspectives of those women.
Accueil >
Insider Perspectives and the Human Rights Debate on Face Veil Bans
Publications récentes
-
Third Party Intervention Submitted to the European Court of Human Rights in XY v….
In February 2026, the Equality Law Clinic participated in a third-party intervention before the European Court of Human Rights in… -
The EU AI Act: A Thematic Commentary
Nathan Genicot contributed to the book The EU Artificial Intelligence Act: A Thematic Commentary edited by G. Malgieri, G. González… -
L’affaire Caster Semenya: démasquer les monstres, célébrer les dieux
Au départ de l’affaire Caster Semenya, cette contribution vise à saisir comment, au nom de l’égalité des femmes et de… -
Le « profilage algorithmique » menace-t-il l’État de droit ?
Nathan Genicot a été interviewé par Guillaume Erner sur France Culture dans le cadre de la rubrique Les chantiers de…