Nathan Genicot has published an article, To Score Is to Decide. About the SCHUFA case, on the Verfassungsblog. The paper looks back at the recent Case C-634/21 in which the CJEU held that scores produced by consumer credit agencies can constitue decisions within the meaning of Article 22 of the GDPR.
Accueil >
Publications récentes
-
Exploring the boundaries of AI regulatory sandboxes under the AI Act: Flexibility and real-world…
Nathan Genicot has published with Thiago Guimaraes Moraes an article in Cambridge Forum on AI: Law and Governance entitled “Exploring… -
Research Handbook on European Anti-Discrimination Law
Edited by Colm O’Cinneide (University College London), Julie Ringelheim (UCLouvain) and Iyiola Solanke (University of Oxford), this Research Handbook (Edward… -
Qu’est-ce qu’une femme ?
Le 16 avril 2025, la Cour suprême du Royaume-Uni a jugé que « les termes ‘femme’ et ‘sexe’ dans la loi… -
Le tournant des méthodes empiriques en droit ?
Frédéric Audren Audren a rédigé la conclusion générale du volume intitulé “Le tournant des méthodes empiriques en droit ?” dirigé…