This paper uses the theoretical framework based on the political notions of recognition and misrecognition in order to analyze the reception of Muslim talaq divorces in French courts. It provides a critical examination of the Cour de cassation’s decision in which the Court ruled that the foreign decision acknowledging talaq divorce is contrary to public policy, and more specifically to the gender equality principle. The paper argues that PIL practices constitute instances of political misrecognition since they fail to account for complex hybrid identities. It claims that political misrecognition is illustrated by the incorporation within law of essentialized, that is narrow and demeaning representations of Muslim legal culture and Muslim women’s identities, and by the enforcement of ethnocentric methodology, which denotes the application of domestic family law choices in the transnational realm.
Accueil >
Political Recognition and Transnational Law : Gender Equality and Cultural Diversification in French Courts
Publications récentes
-
From Blueprint to Reality: Implementing AI Regulatory Sandboxes under the AI Act
Nathan Genicot has written a report on the legal framework for AI regulatory sandboxes under the AI Act. AI regulatory sandboxes… -
La valeur fondamentale de l’égalité des genres comme motif de protection internationale – analyse…
La valeur fondamentale de l’égalité des genres comme motif de protection internationale – analyse de l’arrêt K.L. c. Staatssecretaris van… -
Recension de ‘The Ordinal Society’
Recension dans La vie des idées par Nathan Genicot du livre The Ordinal Society de Marion Fourcade et Kieran Healy… -
To Score Is to Decide. About the SCHUFA case
Nathan Genicot has published an article, To Score Is to Decide. About the SCHUFA case, on the Verfassungsblog. The paper looks…